In DKT v DKU [2025] SGCA 23, the Singapore Court of Appeal has laid down a clear framework for dealing with infra petita challenges to arbitral awards.

On 15 May 2025, Bilateral Investment Treaty between the Government of the Republic of India and the Government of Republic of Uzbekistan ('BIT') entered into force. The BIT has replaced the 1999 treaty terminated by the Republic of India eight years ago. How does the BIT protect Indian investments and investors in Uzbekistan and vice-versa?

What are the common misconceptions surrounding the choice between institutional and ad hoc arbitration?

Learn how the Singapore-Uzbekistan Bilateral Investment Treaty protects Singaporean investments in that Central Asian State.

Uzbekistan has recently passed a new law 'On Investment and Investment Activities'. What does it mean to foreign investors?

The High Court again confirms the non-interventionist approach of English courts in this Section 68 challenge.

The Supreme Court of India confirms: only 'completely perverse' orders by the Tribunal can be challenged under Art. 227 of the Constitution.

Learn about unique features of arbitration in this first post of our Arbythology (c) series.

How can infra petita awards be challenged? SG Court of Appeal's judgement in DEM v DEL provides guidance.

Singapore International Arbitration Centre adopts 7th Edition of the Arbitration Rules. What is new?